seeseemelk/cool-retro-term
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 449 Pull Requests 12 Actions Packages Projects Releases 8 Wiki Activity

Update 3270 font to 2.3.1 #589

Merged
rbanffy merged 3 commits from master into master 2021-06-30 08:49:39 +02:00
Conversation 6 Commits 3 Files Changed 4 +2 -2
rbanffy commented 2020-05-17 13:39:30 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

This version's generated font was renamed from 3270Medium.ttf to 3270-Regular.ttf. The new release also adds 230+ glyphs for interoperability with legacy computing platforms (ATASCII, PETSCII, Apple II, TRS-80, 2x3 mosaics, etc), metadata adjustments and additions, and fixes to already existing glyphs.

This version's generated font was renamed from 3270Medium.ttf to 3270-Regular.ttf. The new release also adds 230+ glyphs for interoperability with legacy computing platforms (ATASCII, PETSCII, Apple II, TRS-80, 2x3 mosaics, etc), metadata adjustments and additions, and fixes to already existing glyphs.
👍 1 🎉 3
alexmyczko commented 2020-12-06 22:29:44 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

great to use debian packages, as it always depends on the latest one: https://salsa.debian.org/myczko-guest/cool-retro-term/-/blob/master/debian/control

great to use debian packages, as it always depends on the latest one: https://salsa.debian.org/myczko-guest/cool-retro-term/-/blob/master/debian/control
rbanffy commented 2020-12-09 13:50:46 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Thanks, @alexmyczko. The Debian package removes this issue, but the font files are still present for the source distribution. Maybe removing the local file and adding a step in the build process to download the latest distribution and license would be a better long-term approach. What fo you think, @Swordfish90?

Thanks, @alexmyczko. The Debian package removes this issue, but the font files are still present for the source distribution. Maybe removing the local file and adding a step in the build process to download the latest distribution and license would be a better long-term approach. What fo you think, @Swordfish90?
alexmyczko (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2021-03-20 17:39:08 +01:00
rbanffy commented 2021-03-20 19:52:06 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Before merging, we may want to get the 2.3.1 version instead.

Before merging, we may want to get the 2.3.1 version instead.
🎉 1
Swordfish90 commented 2021-06-30 08:50:51 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

As always, thank you very much @rbanffy! I'm sorry I kept you waiting for so long.

As always, thank you very much @rbanffy! I'm sorry I kept you waiting for so long.
rbanffy commented 2021-06-30 22:14:44 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

No worries. Maybe perhaps that I haven't updated it to the last binary.
I'll check that.

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 7:51 AM Filippo Scognamiglio <
@.***> wrote:

As always, thank you very much @rbanffy https://github.com/rbanffy! I'm
sorry I kept you waiting for so long.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/Swordfish90/cool-retro-term/pull/589#issuecomment-871143147,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABNDCWLEQX75S4DMOOAEV3TVK5FJANCNFSM4NDLASVQ
.

--
Ricardo Bánffy
http://about.me/rbanffy

No worries. Maybe perhaps that I haven't updated it to the last binary. I'll check that. On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 7:51 AM Filippo Scognamiglio < ***@***.***> wrote: > As always, thank you very much @rbanffy <https://github.com/rbanffy>! I'm > sorry I kept you waiting for so long. > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/Swordfish90/cool-retro-term/pull/589#issuecomment-871143147>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABNDCWLEQX75S4DMOOAEV3TVK5FJANCNFSM4NDLASVQ> > . > -- Ricardo Bánffy http://about.me/rbanffy
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
alexmyczko
Labels
Clear labels
bounty
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
priority
high
priority
low
question
wontfix
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
seeseemelk
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: seeseemelk/cool-retro-term#589
No description provided.
Delete Branch "master"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?